The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data

The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data

Blog Article

I'm an actual admirer from the H4831 powder. I get great velocity and precision from any caliber I've experimented with it in. From your twenty five-06 up on the 338 it is actually my check out powder of decision. I try all kinds of powders when Doing work up loads, although the H4831 usually appears to occur out on best for precision and velocity when the situation is with the 06 class or more substantial.

They are the exact same thing, but H4831 sc is Reduce shorter so it's going to pack into a case simpler then the traditional, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it lets us to incorporate additional powder then just the conventional H4831.

You happen to be proper They're a similar the SC is short Slice so it meters much better, I do not think you can get just typical 4831 any more

While using the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me very good groups and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a noticeably better velocity and gives marginally much better precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. Therefore, in Every single of these occasions I went with Yet another powder, but I will surely detest to divest myself of the H4831.

INgunner54 stated: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some groups.

Because there won't appear to be any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can several of you give a place to begin with this combination and points to think about when Doing work this Load up?

I don't love to work up a h4831sc load working with 1 wide range of powder then have to operate up once more mainly because I operate out and have to start out using a new ton range.

excaliber said: I have uncovered the precise opposite to be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Win Mag.

The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to benefit from the temperature insensitivity of h4831sc a Hodgdon Intense powder.

You might have to help make a few more posts to obtain cleared to complete PM's. When you get to that position I might article from the labeled reloading area to find out if any person is near you for h4831 vs h4831sc a trade. Simply click to develop...

I have had comparable expertise with H4350. For me, some ball powders won't shoot very well with something except Fed215's. Some components just You should not Engage in effectively with other. Seems like you have selected three very good powders, I would hope no less than one of them to shoot.

This can be an Intense extruded propellant and provides heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.

Both equally contain the Exact same burn up fee, small Slash is available in handy If you're at max fill and never at strain/velocity you want you can find extra shortcut in a case.

I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min fees. I’m speaking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain demand in the Norma situation. Not what I had been seeking, but accurate However.